Life of a castle lady

Adult life for a knight’s wife probably began in her middle to late teen years; her husband could be anywhere from 21 to 35, depending on how soon land and affluence had come to him. Upper class girls were sometimes married at younger ages, but it was less important to do this if their status was well below royalty.

Traditionally, the lady of a manor or castle oversaw the household’s domestic affairs. She was expected to inspect the bakery and brewery and consult with the cook. She kept the keys. In the early medieval period, she literally kept all of the household’s keys and gave all orders, often participating in work with her hands. Early medieval ladies were spinners, weavers, seamstresses, brewers and herbalists. Later, as household size grew and staff multiplied, the lady could be less connected to the real work.

In early castles, the lady was the only person who had private rooms. She slept with her husband in a bedroom just behind the Great Hall, and she generally had a sitting room called the solar just above it. But all of her meals were public; when later ladies began taking meals privately, some bemoaned the loss of manners and moral example set by the earlier ladies at head tables of halls.

She spent her day surrounded by a small group of ladies. Often it included some young teenage relatives who needed to grow up and have their manners polished, just as her husband trained teenage boys for knighthood. If she lived in a manor house, she was less likely to have a retinue, but she still had some young women to wait on her. The ladies read to each other while they sewed, or if they did not have much work to do, they played board games and took care of the household’s pet, probably a small dog.

The castle’s chapel probably had Mass every day, so the lady attended every day. She had a Book of Hours that gave the saints’ days to observe, and her household marked them all with fasts and feasts. She spent her spare time embroidering vestments and altar cloths. Setting an example of devout religion was a very high priority.

When she gave birth to a child, she spent at least a month in seclusion in her room. As her children grew, they were cared for mainly by nannies in a children’s dormitory, perhaps with a few orphan wards. She could have them with her some part of the day, in her solar, as she sat sewing. She taught her daughters to read, but saw less of her sons after a certain age, especially if they served as pages in another household. As with all medieval mothers, she may have watched baby after baby die in infancy.

A castle lady’s life tended to be secluded and dull. If she was not fond of her husband, the center of her existence was attending Mass and teaching girls to sew. When she grew old or was widowed, she often gladly resigned the property to her son and retired to a convent, where she could do the same things as ever, but at least had less responsibility.

Posted in Medieval cycle of life | Tagged | Leave a comment

Life as a knight

Adult life as a knight divided into two typical stages. In the first, the young man was a member of another man’s household; later, he would have his own manor or castle to govern.

In the first stage, he had few possessions and generally slept in a dormitory, perhaps even in the Great Hall on its dining benches. In the early medieval period (cf. Beowulf), chests along the walls held pillows and blankets for turning the hall into a bedroom. His day job was to practice for war, including going with his lord out hunting; boar hunting was excellent war practice. At other times, he drilled in tournament skills. When his lord went to a tournament, he went along and participated.

He could not marry, having no home to settle a wife in, and he saw few women who weren’t married. It was quite acceptable for him to have a crush on the lady of the house, as long as whatever he did about it remained sentimental and/or private. He could have affairs with serving women.

Knights who were not attached to a lord’s household were knights errant, and they were very much at loose ends. It was strange and abnormal to be an actual knight, and yet not fitted into the feudal network; it was a sign that something had gone wrong. Some errant knights resorted to taking up a station at one end of a bridge and challenging other knights to fight them or pay. The rules of chivalry developed as a way to control the behavior of young men like this. Knights errant tried to catch a great lord’s attention in battle so that they could get into a stable household and begin their career climb.

In mid life, the knight hoped to be granted a manor to live in and govern. If he could, he inherited it from his own father. If not, it was given to him by the king when some vacancy came up. Perhaps the owner was an enemy whose land was captured, or perhaps a knight died without heirs and his land reverted back to the king. He might also gain the favor of a landowner whose daughter would bring an estate — a significant farm or house or castle — to her husband. Finding a landless knight was one way for a father to make sure his daughter would not be left friendless in a tough neighborhood.

The knight could then marry and join his peers in governing the land. In England, he would be generally known as a Baron ((n Germany Graf, in France Comte, etc.), unless his birth or appointment raised him to Marquis, Earl, Count or Duke. In the cycle of knighthood, a successful knight gained enough land that its rents supported him while he gathered his own household of knights and boys in training — and (always) raised horses.

When the knight grew old, he often became more religious. He began giving away some of what he had won as endowments to chapels and monasteries, to win prayers for his soul. He often went on a pilgrimage, even with a general plan to die on the journey, as it seemed holier that way. In some cases, if he were old, alone and sick, he might resign his posts and go into a monastery as to a nursing home.

Posted in Castles, Medieval cycle of life | Tagged | Leave a comment

Life in the monastery

Having traced the major ways that children transitioned into adult life in the Middle Ages, I’ll describe briefly what it was like to live and grow old in each of these life pathways. Since I was just talking about becoming a monk, I’ll start with the monastic life.

The monastic life was one of incredible sameness, day to day and year to year. Most monasteries were Benedictine, the original order. The whole point of an “order” was that it provided a Rule and life was to be governed by that Rule no matter what. The Rule left little for innovation. It told which hours to pray and sing, which hours to sleep or rest, which to work and which to hold meetings. The whole point of monastic life was to set aside one’s personal will and do what the Rule said; this obedience was itself the service to God.

Monks held prayer and singing services around the clock. They lived in a walled community called the cloister, from Latin claustrum, enclosure. Some of what they needed was imported from outside the walls, but they were as self-sufficient as possible. Since the purpose of the community was to support prayer and celebrating Mass, the first duty of the community was to provide for what these tasks needed: candles, wine, bread, and books. At certain seasons, the church must be decorated with certain flowers. Additionally, monks needed shoes, haircuts, and basic meals. Like any medieval kitchen, the monastic one had to provide bread and ale, in addition to bean stews and fish.

So first, they had to keep bees for the wax. Honey was a cash crop. Climate permitting, they had to plant grapevines so that they could make wine for sacramental use. They needed to grow what vegetables and herbs they could, especially legumes and vegetables like onions, cabbage and beets. With medicinal herbs, they grew a lot of roses and lilies, the flowers dedicated to Mary and needed in church. (And holly, of course, for Christmas.) They had basic farm animals like cattle and pigs, and usually a fish pond. The monastic cemetery usually doubled as an apple or pear orchard and flower garden. Small monasteries did not have the acreage or manpower to grow their own grain or raise their own sheep, but if they had to buy wheat and wool, they had workshops to make their own cowls and shoes. Wheat went to the community’s bakery and brewery, for bread and ale. Robes, sheets and towels had to be laundered. Books on loan from other communities had to be copied; books may also have been a cash export.

This gives you an idea of what the monks did when they were not praying or in chapel. Every monk was apprenticed within the cloister to learn one of these key skills. Additionally, every monk was in charge of his own cowl mending; he had to own a needle and use some of his rest time to stitch up holes. He washed his own stockings, if his order permitted socks, and hung them on a line in the cloister. Every monk borrowed a book from the library at the beginning of the year; it was a saint’s life or work of theology. He studied it during his rest times.

Monks kept very clean, too. They had weekly baths and washed face and hands more than once a day. (Wealthy cloisters had running water in the cells, piped in from a roof tank.) The cloister itself was spectacularly clean, with a neatly-trimmed patch of grass. For anyone who didn’t crave adventure, it was a pleasant place to grow old.

Posted in Medieval cycle of life | Tagged | Leave a comment

Monastic vows

Entering the monastic life began with a year of living as a novice. Novices lived in separate quarters and although they participated in prayers and services, they received instruction in the community’s customs and sign language. Novice-masters expected to do a fair amount of counseling as the novices struggled with depression and discouragement. Monks and nuns were keenly aware of how difficult it could be to adjust to their rigorous schedule; nobody ever had a full night’s sleep. Of course, children raised as oblates had the advantage of knowing customs and schedules already.

Joining the community as a fully avowed monk began in the chapter house, the building designated for the community’s daily meetings. Dying to the world, the novice made a will. Then the sacrist gave him his first tonsure. (Occasionally, a novice had a panic attack while the straight razor was being sharpened, knowing it was the last moment for an easy out.)

Next, the community said Mass, and the novice took his vows of poverty, chastity and obedience. They gave him a cowl, his official robe of the monastic order, and each member gave him a kiss of peace.

The new monk often spent three days with the cowl covering his head, in full or partial seclusion. Partial seclusion meant speaking to no one and keeping even his singing voice to a murmur, taking last place, and remaining alone in the chapel when others were at the chapter house. The three days ended at a Mass where the abbot uncovered his head and made him a full member of the community.

Lay brothers and sisters were not full monks. They took vows of obedience, but did not shave their heads in the tonsure, and they did not wear robes of the order. The chief distinction between lay brothers and choir monks was illiteracy. No one who could not read could become a full monk. Lay brothers lived in separate quarters, took part in some of the prayers and services, but had their own choir area on the other side from the full monks.

Posted in Medieval cycle of life | Tagged | Leave a comment

Why would any teenager take monastic vows?

As described in a previous post, children could be dedicated to the church around the same age that their peers entered school or began professional training. They were not forced to take vows when they got old enough. Monks and nuns were very aware that one of the vows was of “stability,” essentially a promise never to leave the walls of the community unless sent by the Abbot. It was not an easy vow to keep, and they had all known of novices who climbed over the wall and ran away. Much better never to vow.

So the children who grew up in monasteries were permitted to leave, if they chose. But as you might notice, they had a problem: they had missed out on years of alternative training. It might not be as much of an issue if they had been trained in a useful profession at the convent or monastery.

Monasteries always had a core population were choir monks, the most educated ones who sang and prayed, read and copied books. But monasteries also ran businesses. Generations of rich people had left farms, manors, and even mines to monasteries in their wills. Lay brothers had to manage these businesses to generate income that supported the choir monks. So perhaps some of the children raised in monasteries had learned a trade. They had certainly been taught to read, so might make a decent shift as teachers.

But in any event, it seems most of the children who grew up in monasteries took vows. It was a very bad thing to be cut loose in medieval society; you needed to have a place where you belonged: family, guild, church, lord’s service, something. These children knew the monastery and belonged there.

At the same time, there were always young men or women entering the monastic life for the first time at early adulthood. Some were girls fleeing unacceptable arranged marriages in the only permissible way. Some were knights who had sickened with killing or had other crimes on their consciences. Perhaps some others were failed university students.

Then as now, they joined as novices for a trial period. If they could, they brought property or some kind of donation. When a girl’s family wanted her to join a convent, they gave her dowry to the Order.

Why would someone join an Order instead of leading an ordinary life in the world? The men and women who joined a monastery had security that others lacked; belonging to a monastery meant health care and legal protection. While medieval people were as interested in sex as anyone else, they must have observed that family life was often tragic and discouraging. Living as a single person in a monastic community, they need never experience childbirth or the death of children. They would not have to choose which mouth to feed in a famine. They could live in an envelope of meaning, certain that their daily work was somehow redeeming the world in God’s eyes.

Posted in Medieval cycle of life | Tagged | Leave a comment

Becoming a knight

Teenage boys who were in training to become knights crossed into adulthood with the ceremony of dubbing. There were squires who never became full knights, or who remained squires well through their 20s. This would be the case if their families were poor and they never distinguished themselves in battle. But for the majority of young men, knighthood arrived somewhere in what we’d call their college years.

At this point, they had been in battle training for years. They could climb ladders and ropes in full armor, and also jump onto a horse with its weight. (Full armor was not the shining suit of sheet metal you know from the early Renaissance; it was chain mail or a few plates, for most of the period.) They could hunt deer and boar, play chess and talk about battle tactics. They had participated in melees, the dangerous group battles held at tournaments, and they could joust (a battle skill). As squires, they had formed close relationships with important knights and lords in many regions. A knight had to be from a noble family; his father or another close relative had a title and the family owned some land. Usually, they were reasonably affluent.

The dubbing ceremony was at first just a matter of giving good weapons to a new fighter and commissioning his sword as part of the feudal defense of his lord. An established knight gave the new knight a sword and spurs, with a kiss and a declaration that he was a knight. The greatest honor was to be dubbed a knight right on the battlefield where a squire had shown bravery.

But by the 13th and 14th centuries, there was a religious ritual. A group of squires being knighted together went to Mass in the evening, then each had a long bath and pondered his sins, leaving them behind in the bath. Then a group of knights came to dress each in a new white shirt and red tunic, with black hose, a white girdle and a red cloak, all symbolic of purity, willingness to defend the weak, chastity, etc. The knights then led the young men to church, where they prayed for hours and generally kept vigil overnight. In the morning, another Mass.

At the dubbing ceremony after Mass, the presiding knight (the lord who had sponsored their training) gave each a pair of golden spurs with a warning to trample the world’s riches underfoot; these were buckled on by attending knights. Then he kissed the candidate (if one was of high rank, he was singled out to be knighted first, then knighted his pals) and tapped his shoulder with a sword; sometimes he slapped his face. He declared publicly that the man was a knight. When all were knighted, it was time for the feast.

The Magna Carta restricted the king’s power to levy extra taxes unless it was to pay for his first daughter’s wedding or his first son’s knighthood. This gives us a measure of just how seriously the knighted class took its knighthood feasts. Just as there are couples today who live together for years “because we can’t afford a wedding,” some squires lingered in service because their families couldn’t afford the requisite feast. You can see why being knighted on the battlefield was best.

Posted in Medieval cycle of life | Tagged | Leave a comment

Notes on university life

Copying the guilds, which had developed special “livery” robes for their members to wear on parade, lecturers and masters (graduates) began to wear a uniform robe and hat based on the fashion of the times. Many lecturers were monks, so their robes were variants of their order (Dominican and Franciscan usually). Physicians wore special hats in the medieval period, which influenced these outfits too. By the end of the period, Doctors of Theology wore black robes and hats at the University of Paris—our model for the graduation cap and gown. But Doctors of Law in Italy wore red robes edged with fur–take that!

University students did not believe they were under the laws and charter of the town and tended to break its laws flagrantly. They gambled and drank, partied and rioted. In 1355, students rioted in Oxford; several students and townies died, and some colleges went up in flames.

The standard mode of teaching was the formal debate. The professor would propound a question, such as, “Whether lightning be fire that comes down from the clouds?” and a student would begin the response with “principal arguments” to the affirmative. Next, other students or the teacher would pose contradictory arguments. Without real scientific facts, they based arguments on philosophers such as Aristotle. It was a chance to show off logic, rhetoric and reading depth.

Textbooks were copied by hand, but copying industries grew up around universities. It was a type of home-based work that the few educated women could do, and while expensive parchment was used for much of the Middle Ages, in the later times, the new paper industry made short books affordable. It was probably also a line of work for university dropouts or men who had been novices in a monastery without taking the vows.

Textbooks were typically short sections of a longer work, easy to carry to class. They were unlike the famous illustrated manuscripts and much more like modern books. Wide margins provided space to take notes; texts were carefully paragraphed and some red letters (“rubrics”) helped to organize the text visually. As an innovation to help students read at a glance, words had spaces and more attention was paid to punctuation. If you look at typical medieval Bibles, you’ll see just how little they cared about space and readability there.

If you were a student who needed the works of Aristotle for lectures, you would never buy a “collected works” volume as we do. Each work, or each major section of a work, would be bound by itself. Textbook shops in university towns sold these short, practical folios, but they also rented copies. Students who bought paper could rent a book and copy their own, for a small savings.

 

Posted in Medieval cycle of life | Tagged | Leave a comment

Living at a college

“Colleges” as divisions within the university came about as students faced problems in getting good housing. Students could arrive for university studies as young as 14 or 15.

Medieval rich people often donated money at death to found some kind of ongoing work that would promise to pray for their souls. Monasteries and chapels were the most obvious targets, but some began endowing boarding houses for university students. Theology was always a portion of the first four years’ study, even if students went on to law or medicine, so it was presumed that these young men would be a very good prayer cohort. The founder might specify that his own descendants be preferred, or he might specify a certain number of students who could not pay their own way. At the Sorbonne, the first college was a boarding house for poor theology students at the University of Paris (which offered only theology).

When Chaucer described a student at Oxford, he included the fact that this scholar was under constant obligation to pray for his benefactors. https://chaucer.fas.harvard.edu/pages/general-prologue-0

A CLERK ther was of Oxenford also,
                 There was also a CLERK (scholar) from Oxford,
286         That unto logyk hadde longe ygo.
                 Who long before had begun the study of logic.
287         As leene was his hors as is a rake,
                 His horse was as lean as is a rake,
288         And he nas nat right fat, I undertake,
                 And he was not very fat, I affirm,
289         But looked holwe, and therto sobrely.
                 But looked emaciated, and moreover abstemious.
290         Ful thredbare was his overeste courtepy,
                 His short overcoat was very threadbare,
291         For he hadde geten hym yet no benefice,
                 For he had not yet obtained an ecclesiastical living,
292         Ne was so worldly for to have office.
                 Nor was he worldly enough to take secular employment.
293         For hym was levere have at his beddes heed
                 For he would rather have at the head of his bed
294         Twenty bookes, clad in blak or reed,
                 Twenty books, bound in black or red,
295         Of Aristotle and his philosophie
                 Of Aristotle and his philosophy
296         Than robes riche, or fithele, or gay sautrie.
                 Than rich robes, or a fiddle, or an elegant psaltery.
297         But al be that he was a philosophre,
                 But even though he was a philosopher,
298         Yet hadde he but litel gold in cofre;
                 Nevertheless he had but little gold in his strongbox;
299         But al that he myghte of his freendes hente,
                 But all that he could get from his friends,
300         On bookes and on lernynge he it spente,
                 He spent on books and on learning,
301         And bisily gan for the soules preye
                 And diligently did pray for the souls
302         Of hem that yaf hym wherwith to scoleye.
                 Of those who gave him the wherewithal to attend the schools.
303         Of studie took he moost cure and moost heede.
                 He took most care and paid most heed to study.
304         Noght o word spak he moore than was neede,
                 He spoke not one word more than was needed,
305         And that was seyd in forme and reverence,
                 And that was said with due formality and respect,
306         And short and quyk and ful of hy sentence;
                 And short and lively and full of elevated content;
307         Sownynge in moral vertu was his speche,
                 His speech was consonant with moral virtue,
308         And gladly wolde he lerne and gladly teche.
                 And gladly would he learn and gladly teach.

Endowing a college meant setting up a house with some basic staff: cook and laundress. Then someone had to oversee the selection of residents and make sure they prayed for the founder, so colleges also needed manciples or deans. Students who lived in colleges were better behaved, compared to the students who lived in town and were constantly disorderly. College manciples could evict residents who did not follow rules like chapel attendance and curfew. Universities became more respectable places as the college system developed. By the late Middle Ages, some colleges charged living fees, but many students were still taken on full or partial scholarship. The poorest might have to help serve dinner, but they still had the respect of wealthier boys since they had won their places by competition.

Colleges proliferated and grew into communities of more than a boarding house. To help its students, a college built up a library of common textbooks. Then, to help them more, in addition to their attending university-contracted lectures, a college’s residents could work with tutors hired by the college itself. These tutors lived and taught right there on site.

Before the college housing system, universities had no real buildings. The colleges that grew up around them became the first campuses and gave the university brick and mortar solidity. Colleges also promoted the ideal of a scholarly community. Students who lived in other rooms sometimes became petty thieves, in addition to rioting and setting fires. Colleges turned it around; they provided quiet study halls, libraries, tutors, and common dining as we expect today.

I don’t suppose most of them still pray for the founders’ souls, but let’s hope that those generous souls made it out of purgatory long ago.

Posted in Medieval cycle of life | Tagged | Leave a comment

Beginning university

Very few medieval schoolboys were destined to continue to university, but some did. University was preparation for only a few careers: professor, lawyer, doctor, theologian, or dropout. Dropouts tended to become private tutors and secretaries, stand-up comedians on a jongleur circuit, or magicians and alchemists. These last were rare, but the dropout’s knowledge of university subjects is what gave us the movie trope of reading Latin backwards to summon demons.

It’s worth remembering that university professors, church (Canon Law) lawyers, and theologians were traditionally unmarried. The university path did not lead to the church steps. In the story of Peter Abelard and his student Heloise, it only makes sense if we understand that Abelard’s career at the University of Paris depended on his remaining single. Heloise begged him not to marry her, and when he did marry her, her uncle strongly suspected that it was part of a plan to shuffle her off somewhere and continue his career. We wonder why he didn’t just rent a small house and settle in with a wife, and keep lecturing. But to be a university lecturer, a man had to be at least a Canon, the lowest and most secular office of the Church — but still, within the Church.

The first university was specifically for law, at Bologna. Paris and Oxford began next, as theology schools run by the church. Salerno, Italy had an independent medical school, but at Milan and Pisa, medicine was included in a larger university. By the 1300s, most cities had a university.

The entrance exam for university was a challenging test of ability with Latin. Europe continued to pretend, for a long time, that Latin was its real language and that its native tongues were just unlettered vulgar degradations of Latin. University subjects were “advanced” mainly because they were taught in spoken Latin. One of the boundary markers between “medieval” and “early modern” is the switch away from Latin’s use in all books, lectures, note-taking and exams.

The early university was, at base, a small staff surrounding the Bedellus (dean), who undertook to give a challenging graduation examination in logic, rhetoric, music, astronomy, arithmetic and geometry. Students contracted privately with lecturers who could help prepare them for these exams. Lecturers with high success rates drew more students. Students and scholars organized into associations (universitates) for enforcing contract terms so really, collective bargaining created the “university.”

Students held all of the power in the medieval university. They hired and fired lecturers at will. They forced them to start (and end) lectures on time — or pay fines. Lecturers were fined for being absent or for skipping some of the curriculum. Lecturers used their bargaining power with students only to get standardized fees.

In the next few entries, I’ll cover the development of the university into something that looks like what we know today. It’s important to understand that at the start, it was merely a cluster of students who lived in rented rooms and hired lecturers to prepare them for exit exams. Hiring the lecture hall may have been up to the lecturers or the students. The university collected a nominal fee from its students until graduation. As an institution, its power consisted only of granting the diploma, so that’s when the punishingly high fees kicked in. This is why there were so many dropouts. A poor young man could afford to attend lectures, but he couldn’t afford to graduate.

Posted in Medieval cycle of life | Tagged | Leave a comment

Entering a guild

Boys entered the world of men most often by passing exams to become full guild members in their craft. They had spent their apprentice years serving in the shop, first with menial chores, and gradually with more skilled work. In some cases, as in the building trades, they had been hired on work crews at a fraction of the adult pay rate. In other cases, the guild had required them to take a final journeyman year and work in another city, to broaden knowledge of the trade in other places and form useful social ties.

Entering the guild at last was done by an examination that, to us, seems a bit like some of our reality shows. “Iron Chef,” for example, could serve well as a competition for membership in the cooks’ guild, as could “Cake Boss.”

Each guild had a sense of what mattered most in their craft, and they set a challenge. Bakers had to make a certain number of difficult, fancy breads within a set time. Goldsmiths made intricate jewelry. Masons, who were both stonecutters and architects, had to demonstrate that they could make arches, foundations, pillars and walls. Free masons carved sculptures like gargoyles or intricate fan-like supports for the ceiling.

The difficulty of the test went up a lot when the guild felt that their profession was full already. Cities that needed more craftsmen could keep their test easier; doubtless, word got around about how difficult or easy it was to join a city’s guild. Examination pieces must have been shown in the guild hall for a time. It was very difficult to become an armorer in Milan; not so hard to become a saddler in Stockholm.

Once a guild member, the young man may have continued working in the same shop, or he may have used a marriage alliance to join another man’s shop. Although girls were free to marry anyone, they tended to stay within the family profession most of the time. It was an advantage to find a wife who was already used to the hours, smells or dirt of a profession by having grown up around it. In some other cases, inheriting a small legacy at the right time would have allowed young men to start their own shops.

Posted in Medieval cycle of life | Tagged | 1 Comment