Planning for an average wedding

It’s the late 13th century and you’re a prosperous cooper in a mid-sized town in Flanders. Your daughter, age 17, is getting married in the spring, and you need to put on a feast for 100. You live in/above your shop; the largest room seats about 8.

You’ll have to rent a hall, since the weather is still iffy a week after Easter. (Of course, you can’t put on a wedding feast during Lent, since it’s a fast season by definition.) The church has a smallish hall, and the Coopers’ Guild hall is bigger, seats about 50. You think very hard about the Guild hall and try to imagine cramming more people on benches, but it just won’t work. Fortunately, the Coopers have an agreement with the larger Blacksmiths that guild members can rent the Blacksmiths hall for a small fee, if no blacksmiths need it that day. By shifting the day from Tuesday to Wednesday, you’ll be able to get the larger hall, so that’s settled.

The hall has an outdoor kitchen shed with a few cauldrons and skillets. Since you’re a cooper, you won’t have any problems getting any wooden containers your cooks might need, like barrels, buckets and tubs. But you’ve decided to hire a cookshop to cater the meat pies, and it turns out that they also rent kitchen equipment for feasts. The cookshop can help hire a few cook assistants, too. They promised that these guys will show up with clean hands, but you’ll make sure that a stout bucket with soap and water is standing by. Some of these hired day workers can be filthy and even sick.

As the day approaches, two bakers agree to supply you with trencher loaves two days in advance. The loaves will have time to dry up and harden, so that their slices will make good plates. A poor man who sweeps the baker’s shop for a small loaf hears these plans, and he will spread word among his friends so that they can be first in line to get the used trenchers. Trencher bread isn’t prime stuff; it’s made from flour that has any old weed mixed in. But once it’s soaked up a lot of meat sauce, it’s the best thing the beggars will get for a few days. The saucer lets you know that cinnamon and pepper have both dropped in price lately and you will be able to afford a spiced sauce for the meat.

So the staff at the guildhall, overseen by the cookshop and your wife, will stew mutton and pork in light brown sauce, and they’ll also make frumenty, which is like rice pudding made with Cream of Wheat cereal. You want the feast to have three courses, since this is your only daughter and you want it done right. Each course will be the same type of array of meats and side dishes; the fashion for separating courses into different types of food hasn’t arrived yet. Now all that’s left is to get the alewives to brew extra pots of ale and fill up some of your barrels the day before. A barrel of wine will arrive from the local vintner who was late on barrel payments, too.

Posted in Medieval cycle of life | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A wedding in Italy

Weddings in medieval Italy were a little bit different.

The betrothal was a much bigger deal in Italy than in Northern Europe. The bride’s family prepared a lavish feast at their home. The bride’s male relatives met the groom and his family at a notary’s office, and they signed the betrothal agreements (detailing dower and dowry). Then they went back to the bride’s home for the feast. Since medieval Italian girls were sheltered at home more than French or English girls, it may have been the first time the groom got to meet her.

Italian merchants and nobility tended to live in family compounds in the city. The extended family owned all of the buildings in a square of city blocks. Houses as high as four stories surrounded an inner courtyard, and many of the upper stories had balconies or walkways facing the courtyard. The compound generally had its own well and chapel. With servants to go to the market, ladies in the compound rarely had reason to leave it.

Italian brides were probably on average a bit younger than brides in the north, and this may be why Italian betrothals tended to be long. As long as a year might pass before they held a wedding ceremony. This ceremony was much more involved than the simple wedding of the north.

It began with Ring Day. The groom’s family arrived with a gold ring, and wedding guests gathered to witness the vows. As in other medieval weddings, the vows were made in a public place, usually outdoors. The church steps may have been the place of choice, or some other public square, or just outside the family’s house. Notaries could conduct the entire ceremony, asking the questions and hearing the vows. Priests could be involved, but they did not have to be. After the vows, the families had another lavish feast at the bride’s house. The families gave each other impressive gifts. The bride’s trousseau was sent to the groom’s house, but she didn’t go anywhere.

Even in middle-class Italian neighborhoods, the wedding feast became a really big deal. For families that did not have courtyards, the street outside the house would have to suffice. This outdoor space was turned into a royal hall for the occasion. By the end of the Middle Ages, Italian cities were trying to limit the conspicuous consumption with “sumptuary laws” that forbade people below a certain rank from using various fabrics or furs. But never mind that: if possible, the bride was dressed in pure gold.

Most families could never afford cloth of gold, so they borrowed or rented the dresses. They could also rent tapestries to hang over balconies, turning the street into a feast hall. They could rent sculptures, vases, paintings, and draperies. Hired musicians showed up, and lanterns kept the “hall” going well into the night. Guests ate, drank and danced.

The next day, the families sent gifts to each other, and maybe the groom’s side gave a feast. After at least one day of feasting, maybe more, the bride’s family set out at night, with torches, to her new home. She rode a white horse. In Rome, they always stopped at the church for Mass on the way. At last, with pomp and circumstance, the girl was married and moved. And then they had another feast, and maybe another.

Posted in Medieval cycle of life | Tagged , | Leave a comment

With this ring, I thee wed!

The medieval wedding ceremony itself was very simple.

First, the priest had to ask his legal questions. Were they both of age? (Legal marriage age varied with place and time.) Were they legally free to marry–that is, was either already married, or were they within the forbidden degree of relationship? Were they both freely consenting to this union? When the priest was satisfied with the answers, the key moment in the ceremony was when he joined their hands.

The wedding vow of late medieval England ran like this: “I take thee, Joan/Thomas, to my wedded wife/husband, to have and to hold from this day forward, for better and for worse, for richer and poorer, in sickness and in health, till death us depart, if Holy Church will ordain, and thereto I plight thee my troth.”

The priest blessed the ring; only the bride got a gold ring. Then the groom slipped the ring loosely onto her thumb, saying, “In the name of the Father,” and then he moved it to her index finger, “and the Son,” then the ring moved to her second finger, “and the Holy Ghost,” and finally he moved it to her third finger to say, “with this ring I thee wed.” If you ever wondered why that’s the ring finger…well now you know.

The couple’s first act as man and wife was  to give alms to the poor. The poor hung around church doors and in markets. They looked for happy events when people were feeling blessed and would have more pity on a cripple. A man getting married must make sure not only that he was clean and dressed neatly, and hadn’t lost the gold ring, but also that he had his pockets full of small change. Walking down from the church steps, heading toward the feast, he stopped to give to lepers, almsmen, cripples and other beggars. It was a time for generosity to all and gratitude to Heaven.

Posted in Medieval cycle of life, Women | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Wedding on the church steps

The simplest medieval wedding was the informal private marriage, but it was not recommended. All that was truly required was that the couple must say to each other “I take you as my wife” and “I take you as my husband” with some witnesses present. A few men found themselves married without realizing it—but this was a dangerous way of proceeding, especially for the girl. It would be all too easy to repudiate a marriage like this. However, if witnesses vouched for its having happened in their hearing, courts upheld even a marriage like that.

The safe way was to have a public wedding immediately after the proclamation of the banns for two Sundays. (In fact — hold it on Monday, in case hostile witnesses might turn up on Tuesday.) The usual wedding venue was the church’s outdoor front steps. Churches were generally built in a central location for the population. Even small, ancient buildings that seem lost now were once near a crossroads or village settlement. In towns, churches often fronted the market square. No other place could compare in public visibility.

Wealthy families might well pay for a private wedding Mass after the ceremony, or poorer families might schedule the ceremony for just before a regularly-scheduled Mass, but the ceremony itself still took place outside on the steps. Big churches had sheltered porches, since the doors tended to be built into a series of weight-bearing arches. The intentional witnesses to the ceremony could crowd onto the lower stairs or stand in the street, and every passer-by became an accidental witness.

The bride wore her best dress, and if she could, it was a new dress made for the occasion. It was never white; that was a much later fashion. Color implied wealth, so her dress was more likely to be red, blue or green; if she was in a wealthy Italian family, it was “cloth of gold.” In Italy, where wedding display came to mean a great deal, the dress might even be rented. But for the rest of Europe and most people, the dress was simply the bride’s most presentable garment. If she married in winter, clearly she needed a warm cloak, fur-trimmed if possible. The groom, likewise, was dressed in his best clothes for the weather.

They met by appointment at the church, at noon or at the third hour, or in later centuries, they might even meet by an appointed clock time. All through the 1300s, towns were installing mechanical clocks, beginning with the big cities like Paris, Milan and Strasbourg. By 1400, at least half of medieval brides could choose to marry by a numbered clock hour.

Posted in Medieval cycle of life, Women | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Will you marry me?

In medieval Europe, they believed in men and women choosing freely whom to marry. Among the royalty and aristocracy, since marriage was connected to property and government, marriages were basically arranged. But for the rest of medieval European society, marriages were chosen and freely consented to.

Families were still at the heart of the matter; they made alliances with each other, and property was still at stake. Families did the main choosing, and marrying “to disoblige one’s family” was not much done. In fact, since most wealth was still derived from things, mainly stationary things, not portable property or cash, it wasn’t easy to do it. So girls were asked to consent, and usually they did consent.

To put it another way, they always consented. There are many reasons to consent. Some girls consented to marriage after being locked in their rooms for six months. Some girls consented to marrying their father’s creditor to save the family farm. Some men consented to marry a girl, on threat of being fired and blackballed from further work in their trade if they didn’t (what we might call a “crossbow wedding”).

But unlike societies that considered it unseemly for a girl to meet her husband before the wedding, medieval Europe believed in courtship. In courtship, the man brought the girl gifts and tried to make himself likable. Even before the 14th century’s fashion of romantic love, they considered it a very good thing if the couple actually liked each other. They believed in love, even if it was a practical daily kind of love.

By the late Middle Ages, the diaspora-scattering of Provencal troubadours informed wealthy young ladies that love was only real if it carried no obligation. Although the songs praised adultery, the main popular effect was to raise expectations about courtship.

Marriage was a formal, official financial contract. Promising to marry someone needed to be formal and it was often notarized. This was especially true in Italy, where Roman notary customs had continued almost without interruption. In the later centuries of the Middle Ages (1200+), the Italian custom of notarization became more popular, along with using a name signature instead of a seal.

But verbal agreements to marry were binding, too. As paper was more readily available, local court records became more common and detailed, and some still exist. Many court rolls tell us of disputes in which witnesses were called to tell whether they had heard Richard ask Joan to “live with him,” and whether they understood him to mean marriage, and had she accepted a gift from him in token of acceptance? Even if was done seemingly in jest, it could be held as binding in court.

The man may only have been attempting a seduction in a tavern, but witnesses could repeat what he had carelessly said. Usually the circumstances were such that he had found a richer woman who would have him, and he wanted the girl in the tavern to get lost. But courts could enforce the first verbal contract and forbid the man to go through with marriage to the richer girl.

For this reason, the first step in planning a wedding was to publish the intention to marry. In archaic English, this was called publishing the “banns.” On at least two Sundays before the wedding date, the announcement of intention had to be made publicly in church. This gave the jilted girl, Joan, full notice of Richard’s perfidy and sufficient time to find and bring her witnesses. Was it wise for Joan to force Richard to marry her? Probably not; in our terms, we would see Richard outed as bad husband material. But I think they usually did go on to marry, and it may not always have worked out badly.

 

Posted in Medieval cycle of life | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Dowries

Medieval children transitioned into adulthood with growing responsibility in their profession or with marriage. Girls (as always) married earlier, so we’ll start with marriage from the girl’s point of view.

Aristocratic girls could be betrothed or married at very young ages, so as to keep their destiny secure in case of the father’s death. Royal girls were married as “adults” as young as age 12. The four daughters of Raymond IV, Count of Provence all married French or English royalty when they were between the ages of 12 and 16; their betrothal negotiations had begun when each girl was about ten. But poorer girls did not marry so young. Even at that time, people were aware that bearing children was safer in later teen years. So marriage was typically between 16 and 20, for girls, though it varied widely with time and place.

There was one really key issue for girls: dowry. When we talk of dowries today, we think of contemporary India where the dowry is a burden on families of girls, making them less willing to raise girls. But in history, dowries were the family’s way of ensuring that a girl would not be mistreated. First, they put a numerical value on her social status. When a girl came into a new extended family with solid social status, they were less likely to pick on her.

Second, in many medieval European societies, women were permitted to take their dowries back if they could prove that their husbands were abusive. The dowry was the husband’s property, but only provisionally. Separation and divorce were extremely uncommon in medieval Europe, so the dowry was rarely used this way, but the marriage contract sometimes provided that the girl’s dowry stayed with her in the event of widowhood. So dowry requirements could be real burdens on a family, but they were also viewed as part of ensuring the girl’s future well-being.

The young man’s family was expected to bestow property on the couple, too, and this was called the dower. Marriage negotiations could be carried out with several prospective brides and grooms at the same time, since these negotiations were quite openly about money and situation more than about persons.  If a girl’s family could pull together a neat enough dowry to merit a dower offer of a small farm several cows and a solid stone house, the girl was more likely to survive into old age with a warm house and an adequate diet. The stakes were high.

Even poor girls brought something into the marriage. There are records of betrothal agreements that record dowries consisting of a set of sheets and a copper pot. At the very bottom of the social scale would be girls whose family could spare only a set of pewter spoons; at the top were girls who brought with them manors and farms.

In this system, “love” meant the way you treated someone. A girl could promise to love her husband without knowing him because it meant that she would keep his secrets, cook his food, and make sure he got basic medical care if he was sick or injured. That was love. The man’s promise to love was similarly pragmatic. In an unsentimental time when most marriages ended a few years later with death, the stakes were high, but the expectations were low. Happiness meant staying alive, and the marriage was a survival pact.

Posted in Medieval cycle of life, Women | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Orphan children

Many medieval children became orphans, either full orphans or with only one parent. Ironically, becoming an orphan was less of a tragedy for children who were not going to inherit property. Children who already lived in poverty became wards of the town and were assigned some household to grow up in, at the station in which they were born: servants or apprentices. Middle class children generally went into relatives’ families. But wealthy children became hostages.

When a baron died, his widow did not have natural custody rights. If she had her own property, she might be able to buy custody of her children from the king, but if not, then at least around school age, if not younger, off the children went to a guardian’s household. The guardian might be the king or another nobleman, or it might be the bishop. Custody of heirs and heiresses was actually bought and sold; children might be moved to a different guardian’s house without even knowing him.

Orphaned wards were money-makers for two reasons. First, until they were old enough to own the property outright, the guardian had the “usufruct,” that is, the use of the fruit: apples from an orchard, timber from forest, wool from flocks, rent from tenants, and so on. The property’s basic value remained for the orphan, but no interest or other income piled up during his childhood. Second, when the orphan was old enough to marry, the guardian made the match. A wealthy heiress was married to his own son or nephew, to keep the orchard, timber, sheep or tenants in the family’s income rolls; part of the property then stayed in the guardian’s family as her dowry. A wealthy heir wasn’t quite as lucrative, but he too could be forced to marry within the guardian’s family. It was a neat way for kings to reward loyal knights: here, take this orphan and her estate. It cost the king nothing and it was perfectly legal.

The Magna Carta even addressed the abuses of orphans’ property by royal guardians.

Even orphans who stood to inherit no more than a city house became valuable wards on a lower scale. Men with pragmatic morals and gambling debts liked to marry orphans. An orphan girl had veto power, technically, but it wasn’t hard to give her a glowing idea of her future married life to get compliance, and the guardians didn’t care if she was happy. They essentially sold these girls (and boys) to debtors.

So when we hear of aristocratic arranged marriages in those times, and we feel shocked that parents made betrothal agreements for their preschool children, we have to see the other side. A betrothed orphan went to the home of her or his future spouse, and nobody could bargain or buy custody for profit. Assuming the natural parent had made a reasonable choice, the child’s welfare was assured if death came early, as it so often did.

Posted in Medieval cycle of life | Leave a comment

Medieval girls

Meanwhile, what were medieval girls learning? Mostly fabric arts: spinning and sewing. Next to those chief occupations, herbal arts: home medicine and making ale.

All classes and types of girls below the aristocracy could expect to keep a distaff and drop spindle close by at all times. A craftsman’s daughter who was asked to watch the baby was expected to spin most of the time. Farm girls learned to spin in the half-light and even full dark, going by touch. They could spin while walking or talking. Any time they had more than a minute to spare, it was time to pull out the spinning. By the late medieval years, weaving moved from home craft to guild industry, but even professional weavers still bought most of their spun wool or flax from home spinners.

Women at home made most of their family’s clothes and linens, but tailors were taking over a lot of the sewing in towns. Some girls learned fine embroidery skills and could become full-time paid embroiderers working in aristocratic households. Aristocratic girls learned fine embroidery too, but they were not expected to decorate their own clothes. They worked on large decorative fabrics that were given to churches and monasteries. Girls in convents, too, spent hours on these gold-trimmed wall hangings or robes for churches.

Herbal lore had to be passed from women to girls, generation after generation. Herbs were used for medicine, but also for daily use like scenting the laundry, keeping away flea infestations, and freshening breath.

The other major herbal market was for ale. All lower and middle class girls needed to know how to brew. Ale followed local and family recipes, using for flavor anything from pine needles to mint to ivy. Until the use of hops made ale last longer, it had to be brewed in batches that lasted for only a few days. To get fresh ale, your neighborhood needed at least five women who each took a turn brewing and traded jugs of fresh brew. They also supplied taverns and many town women kept up a busy ale-brewing business. Until hops permitted ale to become a large-scale industry, it was never men’s work.

Posted in Medieval cycle of life | Tagged | Leave a comment

Kids’ war games

In medieval wars, the leaders and chief actors were knights, whose children were all in formal knighthood training. But there were always large parties of common men who used bows and spears; at times, their actions were more important than the knights’. Their sons were farm and town boys, apprentices and students with feast days free of work. They liked to gather on town commons and play out large war games, perhaps based on their relatives’ stories.

As adults, they wouldn’t be carrying swords, but nothing stopped the apprentices from making toy swords and wooden shields. Large organized war games incorporated several hundred boys, and they fought with such sincerity that some were injured and occasionally died of their injuries. City governments hated these games and stopped them if they became aware. One can imagine apprentices going about their work, quietly passing the word to their friends about which field and what time to meet.

Students and apprentices also liked to play at tournament games. Without ponies, they had to ride on each others’ shoulders. Without official training equipment, they had to make do with what they could design themselves. Of course, a group of apprentices included kids who were learning to work with metal and wood, so their mock-quintains might be pretty good at times. The quintain was a turning post with a target on one side and a sandbag on the other. The point was to ride past and hit the target, while avoiding the sandbag that swung to get you as soon as the target was dislodged.

Posted in Medieval cycle of life | Tagged | Leave a comment

Boy knights

Medieval children born into land-owning (that is, aristocratic) families had a specific career future to prepare for. Until the late Middle Ages, they were less likely to go to school than their non-aristocratic age peers. In the early Middle Ages, they didn’t even learn to read. Aristocratic boys had one role: war.

Owning land and leading in wartime were connected at the root, because at least since the time of Charlemagne, royal grants of land included a contract to provide a stipulated number of fully-armed knights in time of war. That’s what the land was for. Its rent payments provided income that allowed the warrior class many hours of practice in fighting skills. If they had to plow their own land or operate mills, they wouldn’t be as good at weapons. Forcing everyone to pay rent to them was a way of funding a national army. And every boy born to that family was an automatic recruit.

From the age when other boys began school, aristocratic boys started a long training program. They alternated hours of household service as pages with hours of rigorous fight training. Most of them could already ride ponies before their formal training began; now they rode ponies with added tasks like simple jousting. They began wearing armor to learn how to move in spite of the weight. They were trained in boxing, archery, spear-throwing and sword skills. As they grew older, their page duties shifted to becoming the squires (assistants) to older knights. They remained squires for an indefinite time, depending on the family’s importance and wealth (richer = younger promotion to knighthood).

Not all boys in this training program were aristocrats. It was a war recruitment program that could take in less important, but physically promising, boys. However, no boy could train in knighthood skills without at least one of his parents having aristocratic connections. Use of a sword, in particular, was a class privilege jealously guarded. Tall and strong yeomen could learn archery and spear use, but swords came with rank alone.

Posted in Castles, Medieval cycle of life | Tagged | Leave a comment