Demand for labor after the plague

As the farming situation slowly stabilized in the next century, the plague kept returning to clear out surplus workers. Probably, in every year until the 1600s, someone in Europe had bubonic plague; regional outbreaks occurred without becoming continent-wide events. Other illnesses and weather-related famines took their toll as always.

If Europe had been over-populated for its level of development in 1300, it no longer was. Its level of development sped up after 1400, too. More iron production, more coal mining; more metals of other kinds, more wind and water powered mills; more specialized crafts, more machines to spin, weave and carve; more specialized land use, better crop hybrids. The continent did not again reach a point of feeling like it could not feed its people (barring weather-related famines) for many centuries.

Additionally, the continent’s population was now spilling into the New World. From 1500 to maybe 1950, there was always a sense of some frontier where restless surplus men could go if they weren’t fit for a ladder-climbing traditional rat-race work environment at home. The very existence of a frontier shaped Europe’s mentality, and subsequently, America’s and Australia’s.

People tended to have big families. I want to talk more about this in other ways in future essays, but for now, let’s just look at it economically. There was never a question of five sons growing up and finding no work. (Except for local, temporary downturns, which still happened.) They could go to sea, or emigrate, or head into the city to get job training. If parents could feed ten children, they could feel confident that all ten would find places in the economy.

When the economy is expanding but there are still serious mortality threats, people’s philosophical attitude to individual life is “it is precious.” Each person matters and can fill out the place the world has for him.

This idea became a bedrock notion of Western society. It shaped medicine, farming, education, social class change, and religion. I’ll pick up another thread of life after the Black Death next, but we’ll find that other topics, too, eventually connect to the same idea.

Posted in Black Death | Leave a comment

Peasants in revolt: 1381 and after

During the same period of time that the plague was ravaging the population, England had attempted to maintain a state of near-constant war with France. The purpose of war was to defend original English royal family holdings in France; these provinces were wealthy and the kings could not afford to lose them. However, the battles did not directly benefit the common people, and in both countries, peasants resisted the way the cost always fell on them.

The kings of England were fully complicit with other landowners in trying to keep peasants on the land. Edward III, king during the Black Death, had supported laws that limited wages for rural workers to whatever they got before the plague. His son, Richard II, now faced worsening wage inequity, lower tax revenue, and continued pressure to keep up the battles for royal property in France. He was only 10 when he became king.

The old tax base was based on farm revenue, now badly disrupted by all of the dramatic economic changes. Parliament passed a poll tax, “poll” being the old word for “head.” If peasants were cut free from their manors and now working in towns, they would have to be counted that way and taxed individually. The poll tax was a one-time event created to raise quick money in 1377, but it was repeated in 1379, and again in 1380. Each time, those who had to pay grew more resentful. They began to evade paying. Parliament responded by raising the tax and cutting out the loophole of allowing a married couple to pay one single rate.

Peasants had been organizing strikes and complaints against their landlords for several years by then. Towns had seen riots and the ruling elite were often divided against each other. Towns were also filled with people who had simply run away from their farms without permission, seeking work. It was a bad time for the government to press the tax, but of course they did it anyway.

The tax collector in Essex tried to arrest a village representative for refusing to collect more tax, but the villagers had come armed and they resisted arrest. From that point, it flamed into open war. Armed peasants marched on London and into Suffolk to start a revolt there. Meanwhile, an attempt to capture a runaway serf in Kent began a rebellion there. Its leader, Wat Tyler, became the leader of the entire 1381 uprising, often called Wat Tyler’s Rebellion.

Over the next year (people and news traveled slowly), many local battles were fought. The main drama happened in London, where the armed mob attacked many public buildings and some palaces, including the Savoy Palace of the young king’s uncle, John of Gaunt, a power broker. They finally seized the Tower of London. The mob also massacred Flemish workers, seen as immigrant labor threats.

The 15 year old king was in the Tower of London, the royalty’s last fall-back fortress. He made the wise choice to ride out with a small guard and talk to the rebels; while he was out, the mob seized the Tower itself, beheading several officials. The castle was looted and several royal family members nearly killed (the future Henry IV barely escaped). Meanwhile, Richard II promised the rebels many of the concessions they demanded. He signed a charter they had drawn up. Their guard now let down, some of the rebels went home.The king then met with the remaining rebels again, specifically with Wat Tyler, at a place called Smithfield. Tyler was rude and got into a quarrel with one of the king’s servants, who stabbed him. The teenage king, showing courage nobody expected (nor ever saw again), rode his horse to the front of the mob and asked for their loyalty, leading them away to prevent open battle. Wat Tyler’s head was cut off, naturally. Other rebels were executed at Smithfield.
It took the government a few months to finish executing all rebels and stopping all further regional rebellions. Richard II’s charter was torn up. He had no real intention of reforming anything. England, like other European countries, reacted to early peasant revolts with violence and suppression. France, Hungary, Belgium, and Germany all had uprisings over the next century.But nothing could really stop the economic changes. You can suppress and execute peasants, but you can’t really make them pay taxes if they’re determined not to. You can’t really keep them on the manor if they are physically able to run away and hide in the city. By 1450, when there was another significant uprising, the feudal system was pretty much gone. Farms paid wages and men could choose their line of work.

Posted in Black Death | Tagged | Leave a comment

Farming after the plague

The Black Death lasted about 3 years, but only about one year in any one place. After that, each regional economy, and Europe as a whole, began to recover. The men and women who’d taken the places of the ones who died probably continued to plow, sow and harvest. But almost immediately, prices were destabilized and long-term changes set in motion.

When nearly half the population has died in one year, the food planted for them is enough and too much for the survivors. Demand goes down; prices fall. For buyers, this is great. People who managed to survive the plague could eat much bigger meals now. There was more grain to turn into beer. Although many cattle, sheep and pigs had died too, there was still a bit more meat to go around.

Even better for workers, demand for labor goes up. Low-skill, weak workers used to be unemployable, but now they could walk into any farm harvest and ask for top dollar (or top silver denier). Jobs in town were the same way; apprenticeships had been disrupted and many jobs were open.

At first, it wasn’t a big difference, just a comfortable one. “Eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow you may die” was the motto of the next decade, and they really did earn more, eat more and drink more. But then the plague came back, just when the post-plague babies were turning 8, 9 and 10. These young men and women who were about to become the plow and harvest teams were hit hard by the epidemic. More adults died too, of course. About five years later, coming up toward 1365, the labor market changed.

There simply were not enough farm workers. Town life was somewhat easier and certainly more sociable, so many young people had gone off to fill in the labor shortages in cities. The only way landlords kept peasants down on the farm was to block them, legally, from leaving. In feudal theory, every peasant born on the land owed farm service to the landowner. He or she could only leave by paying off the lifetime service that should have been given. When a girl married onto another manor, the family had to give some in-kind payment to the landlord; when a boy went to town to learn a trade, they also paid. By default, that child owed a lifetime of part-time labor just by being born there.

The feudal law was clearly unjust to workers, by 1370. Peasants could get much better wages in town than on the land, where their labor was taken for granted and cash was only raised by their own market gardening. They began to ask the landlord to pay them wages. Sounds fair enough. But prices were still dropping, and the landlords were the wholesalers of farm produce. When they couldn’t get pre-plague prices at market, they couldn’t pay post-plague wages to their workers. Now what?

 

Posted in Black Death | Tagged | Leave a comment

Farming during the plague

One of the really odd notes about the plague is that, from what we can tell, farming wasn’t much affected by the rapid rate of human and animal death. That is, we only know what the manor harvest record books tell us, in the cases where these books have been preserved through fire, mold, and revolution to the present day.

We’d expect that the plowing didn’t get done, the sowing wasn’t completed, and the harvests weren’t collected. Human death rates were at least 30% and in some cases as high as 60%. Some tiny villages closed up when the survivors had to move, being too few to keep the settlement going. These villages were often staging bases for farm workers to walk to their fields.

There’s a kind of economics study that deals in historical problems, trying to reconstruct what probably happened. Using what we know now about prices and markets, they look at the clues from the past and assemble a reasonable guess. Other historians then look at period art or archeology and try to confirm these guesses. At some point, we feel that we “know” what happened and can say so with reasonable confidence.

The conclusion that these studies have come to, concerning the Black Death, is that Europe was over-populated in 1347. Of course, it had far fewer people than it does today. It was over-populated specifically for its ability to grow food; it may have been over-populated for its infrastructure, too. We know that they were running out of wood, since so much wood was being turned into charcoal to make iron, which then replaced wood in buildings. We know that the rivers were over-flowing with sewage.

We know that the European diet before the plague had become sharply divided between rich and poor, with the poor eating very little meat, mostly legumes and coarse grains. Normal people ate two meals per day; they went straight to work in the early morning and only ate breakfast around 10 am., which then allowed them to work until sunset, when they ate again. There was no spare food to carry along in a pouch for “lunch.” A third meal was only invented in the next generations, when diet had changed after the plague.

As far as we can tell, field work never stopped because no matter how many people dropped dead, there was generally someone else ready to take over. What were these people doing before their friends died? We don’t know. Medieval Europe didn’t count “unemployment.” It showed up mainly in hunger: and we do know they were hungry.

 

 

Posted in Black Death | Tagged | 1 Comment

Society after the plague

We know a great deal about the 14th century plague because paper had been invented and in many places, especially around the Mediterranean, was widely available. People wrote letters and copyists made textbooks, but there was so much paper that men began to keep diaries for their own use. From letters and diaries, and also from sermons that were written down, we know a lot about how culture began to change when the infection subsided.

When all the bodies were buried and grass grew over the graves, the memory of such a surfeit of death remained the controlling principle in people’s life decisions. There were three immediate effects.

The first year after the plague subsided, the birth rate was unusually high, even for the smaller number of surviving women. There are some signs that more twins than usual were born. I’m put in mind of The Shire after Galadriel’s dust has blown out over the lands, when hobbit children were born as twins and with especially curly hair. But there was no magic.

We don’t have proof that there were many twins, unless someone’s PhD research has turned it up by examining birth records. If there were more twins, the explanation may be in our unconscious animal natures. When mice, rats and rabbits are overcrowded, they stop having large litters and some females stop having babies entirely. The animals aren’t calculating survival numbers; their endocrine systems react to signals that we can’t quantify yet. What if something like that was happening? People, as smart as they are, still have animal natures and pick up chemical signals that we can’t yet identify. Maybe the severe loss of life signaled unconsciously for higher fertility.

The other changes were more conscious. Traumatized society turned to or away from religion in more dramatic ways than ever before. Until now, the basic idea had been that monasteries took care of holiness so that the average man could be no more than averagely righteous. This wasn’t good enough now. People began to ask questions about where the soul went after death. Many of the dead hadn’t been properly given last rites or burial prayers. This couldn’t mean they were all in hell, could it? People wanted to find their own holiness. We can find the earliest groping toward what became the Reformation here, as people wondered if it might not be better to read the Bible for themselves. In Italy, some people began to have small home Bible studies.

To the opposite pole, other people ditched religion entirely. It had failed them; its promises were void. What good did fast days and saints’ relics do during the plague? None at all. In fact, they believed that the irreligious sometimes survived better. Heavy drinking and eating may have “balanced the humors” of the body, even if prohibited by religion. Sexual mores followed quickly. The survivors wanted to make up for lost time, and as mentioned before, they may have been responding to hormone signals to replace population.

Writers noticed that young people were behaving shamelessly. Girls dressed with no modesty and stayed out till all hours with young men. They drank and sang, they paid no attention to their family’s reputation. They got married while pregnant (probably with twins).

Another factor here was that modesty no longer made sense. People had seen every body part exposed many times during the plague. What did it matter if cloth covered more or less of the body? Who hadn’t seen a dozen penises on sick people or corpses, and bared breasts in just about any circumstance at home or on the street? Who hadn’t seen legs and arms, once beautiful and sexy, then wasted and covered with flies? Art no longer beautified death; expensive stone effigies began to show gross corpses, not people in robes. Skeletons danced like drunken men across the landscape, urging everyone to eat drink and be merry, then die: ready or not!

Posted in Black Death | Leave a comment

Cities coping with plague

Because the plague had such a low rate of recovery and high speed of infection, it disrupted towns and cites more than past epidemics. Cities varied in how well they coped.

Probably the best-organized city in Europe was Venice. Venice, born in swampy islands of the Adriatic Sea, could never count on an easy life. No food was grown there; all had to be shipped in. Stone buildings were impossible on the soft ground until thousands of long logs were pounded into the ocean bed to form an artificial platform. The harbor was artificial, too, built as a planned defensive and manufacturing hub. Venice had three sources of income, all of which required intense social cooperation and planning. They made salt in the marshes along the mainland and carried a lot of other cities’ goods in their ships. They learned the secrets of fine glass from Constantinople and set up a secretive factory on a nearby island, on Willy Wonka’s model: nobody came and nobody left, except for those permitted to ship the finished glass out and the supplies in. The ruler of Venice, the Doge, had more power than other rulers of his time, and he even employed a modern spy network to root out possible infiltrators or traitors.

All of this helped Venice when the plague struck. Their ferry and canal boat services suffered many staff losses, but boats never stopped picking up garbage and corpses. The ferries to the mainland, now often for burials, never failed. The city had learned rigid discipline in order to survive, and that discipline helped them survive again. The death rate from the plague itself was just as high as anywhere else, but there were fewer victims of abandonment and neglect.

Some other cities in Italy fell apart completely, and London and Paris faced the same problems. Italy, a direct heir of Roman legal traditions, used a lot of notaries to draft and certify contracts including wills. Italian notaries were called to death beds to take dictation, with witnesses nearby to put their seals to the document. But during the plague, by the next day, notaries would find that the witnesses had died and the executor was sick; the heirs died before there was time to write a new will, and then the notary died. It was extremely difficult to keep accurate records, and at the height of the plague, death records can’t be considered accurate. We can assume that Venetian notaries kept plugging away, but in other cities, things began to fall apart.

In Florence, as in London and Paris, city services stopped. Officials left their posts and fled into the countryside (this had been a custom in Roman times too). As mentioned before, families sometimes locked a sick person in with a pitcher of water, refusing to come near again or even leaving the house so as not to see the end. But these measures weren’t enough to save them; Bocaccio reported seeing a dead man’s blanket in the street, nosed at by two wandering pigs, and within eight hours, the pigs were both dead. People, too, died as they were fleeing, abandoning or neglecting their duties.

City systems broke down. Bodies went unburied. They piled up in the streets, where pigs and dogs could molest them (and then die). They piled up near cemeteries where the land had been filled as deep as they could dig. Priests and bishops were afraid to go out and consecrate new fields for burial, or they were dead too. Whole monasteries collapsed with few or no survivors. Entire schools died.

If these problems had been severe for only a few weeks, society would have recovered. But the peak of the plague lasted as long as six months and more. It seemed like the end of the world to the suffering. Some of them decided that morality was a waste of time, so they ate and drank anything they could find. Some of them broke into houses to raid the pantries and party in someone else’s kitchen. They looted the houses of the dead. They drank to excess, to see if that would balance the body’s humors and save lives. I’m pretty sure it didn’t. They, too, died.

Posted in Black Death | Leave a comment

Scapegoating Jews in 1349

When we look back on the events of 1349, it’s easy for us to connect the massacres of Jews with the 20th century’s Holocaust. The connection is real, but we need to look with fresh eyes at the events of 1349. The horrific mass deaths were motivated by prejudice and greed, but even more, by fear. By their standards, there was solid forensic evidence that the mysterious plague was really a simple matter of poisoning. In our terms, the evidence if flimsy, and even then not everyone believed it. But we’ll understand the collective trauma better if we try to take seriously what it felt like to be a German townsman of the 14th century. What they did to the Jews of their cities was more inhuman than the plague itself; but it can help us understand both the extremities to which fear can push people and the lasting effects of the fear and trauma on both victims and perpetrators.

Germany was the last major European region in which life went on as before. There were few trade routes with Germany, and by 1349, the Hanseatic League’s dominance of shipping had ended. Sadly for London and Paris, they had become much more dependent on Mediterranean vendors, who brought the plague. But the Hanse’s old territory was still a bit set apart, due to its previous tight monopoly. There were few overland roads, so not many people moved from Italy to Germany, across the Alps, or even across French territory to inland cities.

So Germany had fully a year to hear of the horrors in Rome, London and Paris. During this year, they tried to find out if they could stave it off. When rumors spread that perhaps Jews were causing the “plague” by deliberate poisoning, they listened.

In the Swiss town of Chillon, on Lake Geneva, the city council heard evidence straight from a local Jew. They wrote out a document that was duly copied and signed with their seals, and sent it to the cities nearby. It warned that the Chief Rabbi of Toledo, Spain had commissioned Jews to put poison into wells, and that they had been shown this poison and told how it was placed into wells.

We’ll probably never know what really happened. It seems likeliest that they tortured some Jews to get them to confess, but it is also possible that someone lied under oath for other reasons. It was patently false to sensible people even at the time; the Pope issued his own document, a Bull (named for the type of seal the Pope used), to declare that the plague was not caused by poison or Jews. Some local secular rulers declared it nonsense, too, including the King of Aragon and the Duke of Austria.

But the people of Germany were hysterically gripped with fear. Some city councils voted to believe the document from Chillon, while others did not—but the people took it into their own hands. They felt that they could not take any chances; the only safe Jew was a dead Jew. So in many places in Europe but especially in German cities like Strasbourg and Mainz, Jews were rounded up and deliberately put to death.

Germany had been one of the safe havens for Jews since Roman times. While England and France had often overtaxed or expelled Jews, these German cities had encouraged prosperous vineyard owners and traders. Strasbourg recorded the death of 16,000 Jews; Mainz recorded 12,000 deaths. In Mainz, Jews tried to fight back and succeeded in costing the Christian attackers 200 lives, but they were a minority and the people were hysterically determined. From the Swiss border to the Baltic, the German Jewish population became extinct. Survivors, probably those who took alarm first, escaped to Poland, where the King welcomed them. (And that’s why so many of them were in Poland and Lithuania in the 20th century.)

There’s a really gripping, personal sorrow to these accounts since medieval life didn’t offer the modern mask of machine-like efficiency. In one city, the Jews were ferried to a river island, where they were stripped of their clothing (a valuable resource) and placed in a large wooden house or barn. When the doors were locked, the ferry returned; the buildings were burned down. In another city, they disposed of dead Jews by putting their bodies into old barrels and pushing them into the river. Many of them were killed by the sword.

Is it possible that some of Germany’s later antipathy to the Jews originated in collective historical guilt from the 14th century? Their cities hosted no Jews for a long time, until in the early modern years Jews began to migrate back from Poland. Humans don’t always greet the descendants of those they once wronged by making it up to them in compassion. Sometimes they justify their actions and hate all the more. They pick and criticize, finding reasons why it was okay to despise and wrong these people. We all do it; it feels better than guilt, which is surely one of the most intolerable emotions. We should always ask ourselves if we are guilty toward those we hate and criticize.

Posted in Black Death | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Plague’s path of destruction

The plague’s visitation in each place lasted for about a year; the first cities struck down were starting to see no new cases, a year later. But it took a full three years for the disease to work its way through all of Europe. Italy was in recovery before Germany began to suffer.

It’s significant that Germany was affected last, because people’s coping strategies changed as time went on, and their subcultural ways were already different. Before we discuss Germany’s hysterical response, we have to see what had come before.

The plague began in Sicily, Marseille and Genoa. We have very detailed records from Italy, France and England; we have fewer records from Spain and Germany. Here is a general plot of the infectious progress:

November, 1347: Constantinople, Messina, Marseille, Genoa
January, 1348: Avignon (France); Venice (Italian island); Ragusa (modern Dubrovnik, across the sea from Venice)
March, 1348: Spain; Florence, Italy (disease moves inland)
June, 1348: Paris, France
August, 1348: Rome, Italy (more inland progression); coast of England
September, 1348: spreading in France and Spain
November, 1348: London, England

By this time, as the plague grew severe in London, Genoa and Marseille were seeing no new cases. Each month that the plague grew worse in the north, the Mediterranean’s health improved. But when the plague struck in the north, they didn’t yet know that it would only be a year to hold on; that’s hindsight at work. So by 1349, the northern Baltic regions, and inland on Europe’s rivers, were just beginning to catch the infection but had heard all about just how terrible it was. They were terrified.

April, 1349: Norway
June, 1349: Sweden; Bavaria and Vienna
August, 1349: Poland
January, 1350: Scotland, Ireland

1349 was the calamitous year for central Europe. The plague was still at peak in London and Paris, and now each German city was holding its breath awaiting its first case. This is the period when the Flagellants began to pilgrimage around Flanders and nearby, flogging themselves to bleeding and crying out for God’s mercy. Europe completely despaired. They were only starting to see that Italy was doing better, so the news didn’t cheer them at all.

The emotional trauma of a four year period of calamitous sickness, even if not every region was in the same straits at all times, changed Europe’s culture. By 1351, the worst was over. Some regions had been touched lightly, like the hills of Ireland, but most had lost between 30 and 60% of their population.

Posted in Black Death | Leave a comment

What did people do when plague struck their town?

Frankly, they didn’t know what to do. First, they didn’t know that a historic plague was starting; it could have been a smaller epidemic of the sort that passed through every few years. So they began by not altering their routines and hoping for the best.

They did sick care for family members until many of them started panicking. Then they abandoned the sick, sometimes leaving them with a pitcher of water and promises, locking the door and not coming back until it was over. Survivors who wrote about the terrible time recalled instances of abandoned husbands, wives, and young children.

Nobody really thought about quarantining the sick, but a few healthy people tried their own quarantine. One family in Italy filled the house with supplies and then locked the doors and sealed the windows. They just didn’t come out for several months, and they survived. The rich fled into the country, assuming that the plague would not follow them there. They felt safer in the hills, where the air was cleaner and cooler. Of course, if this strategy worked, it was only because it acted as quarantine. The plague spread inland and wiped out country villages like anyone else.

The Pope stayed indoors next to a hot fire as the infection passed by in 1347 and 1348. It worked; the Pope survived. Maybe it was too hot for the fleas.

Natural selection pushed those with natural immunity into posts of public service, including grave digging. Communities could hardly keep up with the pace of grave digging, and at the peak of the infection they resorted to mass graves. Bodies were layered with sand between them, “like lasagna,” one Italian commented. Grave diggers didn’t seem to get sick, so with flawless post hoc reasoning, some people concluded that breathing the smell of the dead caused immunity. Parties of terrified citizens would go out to the burial grounds and deeply breathe the foul air of the stacked corpses.

By 1349, as the plague roared into Northern Europe, people tried public confession of sin. Flagellants vowed to go on pilgrimage (locally) for 40 days, walking in a group and lashing themselves with whips in each town center to show public sorrow for sin. They hoped that God’s punishment could be turned away.

The plague went into Muslim areas of Spain, and we have records that religious fatalism wasn’t very helpful. Doctors who tried too hard to save patients might be flogged for thwarting God’s will. So some people really did nothing when the plague arrived. They waited it out and cleaned up afterward. Christians believed it was meritorious to save the sick, perhaps modeling their efforts after their cult of the saints. They just didn’t know how. It would take several more visitations of the Bubonic Plague before anyone began to notice isolation and masks helped.

Posted in Black Death | Leave a comment

The “Black Death”

There’s no special reason why the plague that began in 1347 is called the Black Death. It wasn’t called so at the time; the nickname seems to have begun several centuries later, perhaps as a mistranslation. When survivors looked back on those dreadful three years, they called it the Great Mortality.

Like all plagues of the ancient world, the infection made several body systems break down at once. The most visible sign of the infection was the “bubo,” an egg-shaped swelling in the lymph nodes. We named it Bubonic Plague for these painful outbreaks. There were some survivors of the infection, including a few who lanced and drained their buboes. The buboes were ugly but not the most virulent part of the disease.

Bubonic Plague is famous for being spread by rat fleas; this is true, but it seems to have been more strictly true of later outbreaks, including one in the late 19th century when the bacterium was isolated and named Yersinia pestis. In later outbreaks, such as in India, people saw many dead rats. Dead rats are missing from medieval accounts, although other dead animals, such as pigs and cattle, are described. There may have been dead rats, but they were not dying in conspicuous enough numbers.

Yersinia pestis originated in the Central Asian marmot population: the woodchucks of the Silk Road. Global cooling may have flushed them out of northern plains, closer to the Silk Road, and greater merchant traffic meant that more unwary strangers were skinning and eating them—and picking up their fleas. But there’s no way to account for the way Y. pestis spread in Europe unless fleas on human hosts began to carry it. Not only did this zoonotic disease jump from marmots to humans, it moved from marmot/rat fleas to human fleas. It may also have gone airborne for a while. It appears to have mutated several times in the process.

The infection spread along the Silk Road in both directions; it devastated India and China, although Europe was not aware. It reached the Tatars as they laid siege to a Genoese colony on the Black Sea; as they grew desperate, the besiegers catapulted dead bodies over the city wall, spreading infection. Survivors ran to their remaining ships and put out to sea, hoping to escape to other Genoese colonies. But each time they tried to land, the harbor workers saw that they had plague and drove them off. Unfortunately, there was just enough contact each time that every Genoese colony took infection. By the time the remaining ships with the last dying people reached Marseille and Genoa, the infection had begun to take off in all of these port towns. Genoa heard of it in advance and drove off the ships with flaming arrows. The plague still spread (perhaps even from the messengers who brought warning).

Like a newspaper lit in several places, the Mediterranean coast spread the infection from town to village and from boat to boat. Within two months, most port towns had the plague.

Posted in Black Death | Leave a comment